Wyoming Defends Crypto-Friendly Banking Charter in Court Case

• Wyoming has requested to intervene in a case between Custodia Bank and the Federal Reserve System, seeking to defend its framework allowing certain crypto firms to qualify as state-chartered banks.
• The Fed rejected Custodia’s application for a master account that facilitates international transfers, citing perceived inadequacies in Wyoming’s laws and regulations.
• Attorney General Bridget Hill filed a motion to “intervene in the defense” of the state’s regulations, arguing that the Fed’s decision questions the legitimacy and viability of Wyoming’s statutory framework.

Wyoming defends Crypto-Friendly Bank Charter Regime Against Federal Reserve

The U.S. state of Wyoming is intervening in a legal battle between Custodia Bank and the Federal Reserve System (Fed) in order to defend its regulatory framework permitting some crypto firms to become state-chartered banks. On April 10th, Attorney General Bridget Hill submitted a motion to “intervene in the defense” of Wyoming’s Special Purpose Depository Institution (SPDI) regulations against accusations from the Fed that they are inadequate for protecting investors from high risk activities within the crypto sector.

Background on Custodia Bank & Master Account Dispute

Custodia, formerly known as Avanti, became the first financial institution approved for an SPDI charter under Wyoming law when it received approval last October 2020. However, when Custodia applied for a master account—which allows an institution to make international transfers as well as other functions—the Fed delayed review of their application until January 2023 when it was ultimately denied due mainly to concerns over its focus on crypto services being deemed too risky by regulators. After this rejection, Custodia filed suit against both local and federal arm of the Fed accusing them of unlawfully delaying their application process while also raising objections against Wyoming’s SPDI laws themselves.

Wyoming Takes Action To Defend Regulatory Framework

In response to these accusations from federal regulators, Attorney General Hill has decided that it is necessary for her office step into proceedings on behalf of her home state by filing a motion allowing them intervene “in defense” of their SPDI regime which is currently under attack. In her filing Hill argued that any negative assessment from the fed regarding these rules would call into question their “legitimacy and viability” going forward which could have far reaching implications not just within Wyoming but across all fifty states if allowed stand unchallenged.

Implications For Crypto Regulations Nationwide

This lawsuit marks just one more conflict between cryptocurrency industry players and traditional financial institutions like banks looking protect their dominance over global payments systems despite growing interest amongst consumers digital assets like bitcoin (BTC). While there are no guarantees about how this particular case will play out given changing legal landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies in U.S., any victory or defeat may set precedent future similar disputes nationwide depending upon outcome here so all eyes remain focused proceedings surrounding this matter moving forward time will tell what final results be once dust settles after hearings come conclusion sometime later year .


In conclusion, attorney general Bridget Hill has taken action on behalf of her home state by intervening in dispute between custodial bank and federal reserve system protect its regulatory framework allowing certain crypto firms become state chartered banks amid accusations made by fed concerning perceived inadequacies within those laws being used judge company’s application process granting them access much needed master accounts facilitate international transactions services alike stay tuned future developments proceedings further down road result could have wide ranging implications industry space at large regardless how situation plays out long term .

You may also like...